In a recent review article published in the journal Microscopy Research & Technique, researchers focused on the integration of DL into optical microscopy, exploring its application in image classification, segmentation, and computational reconstruction.

Image Credit: vs148/Shutterstock.com
Background
Optical microscopy is a vital technique in biomedical research, offering the ability to visualize subcellular structures beyond the limits of human vision. Despite its foundational role for over 400 years, conventional optical microscopy faces several intrinsic limitations, including diffraction-limited resolution, optical aberrations, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and poor contrast. The exponential increase in bioimaging data has further amplified the need for advanced computational analysis. Deep learning (DL), a subset of machine learning, has emerged as a transformative solution to these challenges, enabling enhanced precision, reducing the need for manual analysis, and decreasing reliance on domain-specific expertise for tasks like image enhancement and reconstruction. The study examines prominent DL architectures, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), U-Nets, Residual Networks (ResNets), and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and their contributions to various microscopy modalities.
Studies Highlighted in This Review
The integration of deep learning across diverse microscopy modalities addresses specific optical limitations. In Brightfield Microscopy, which is limited by low contrast and resolution constrained by the light wavelength, DL models enable efficient and accurate segmentation of live images, optimizing data extraction from high-throughput experiments. Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM), a classic label-free method that converts phase shifts into intensity contrast, often suffers from imaging artifacts like halos and shadows. Here, physics-informed and self-supervised U-Nets have been used to reconstruct phase maps from defocused bright-field images, while GANs (specifically pix2pix-style models like GANscan) accelerate image reconstruction by effectively deblurring continuously scanned images while preserving fine structural details.
For Confocal Microscopy, which traditionally has a resolution limit of around 180 nm, hybrid deep learning methods such as ResU-Net significantly improve resolution to approximately 120 nm, allowing clear visualization of structures like mitochondrial ridges. These hybrid models enhance the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in tissue samples. In Widefield Fluorescence Microscopy, which is less invasive, DL models like ResNet-101 are employed for classification tasks, such as screening fundus disease using ultrawidefield images. GANs also play a role by generating realistic ultra-widefield retinal images, which helps supplement small datasets and improve the performance of disease detection models.
In the realm of Nonlinear Multiphoton Microscopy, which is crucial for high-resolution tissue imaging, U-Net models perform image segmentation to isolate structures like elastic fibers and cells, even under conditions where low light exposure (due to phototoxicity concerns) results in low-resolution images. The DL method CARE successfully reconstructs high-resolution images from these lower-resolution inputs, improving safety while maintaining image quality. For Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy (LSFM), which deals with challenges such as anisotropic resolution and uneven illumination, U-Net architectures (including 3D adaptations) are popular for segmentation. GANs expand LSFM's capabilities for deconvolution and super-resolution by translating low-contrast images into high-contrast equivalents and improving contrast without paired ground truth.
Discussion
Despite the significant enhancements DL brings to optical microscopy, several critical challenges remain. A primary obstacle is the dependence on large, high-quality, and domain-relevant pretraining datasets. When datasets are mismatched or too small, models can suffer from overfitting, inadequate accuracy, and negative transfer. Furthermore, achieving data that is varied and balanced across all subgroups is challenging, which can lead to biased statistics and inaccurate predictions when Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are trained on biased data. Another major difficulty lies in generalizing DL models across different imaging modalities and various acquisition techniques. Even with careful pre-processing, essential for eliminating outliers and missing values, the process can be complex and errors can still lead to inaccurate outcomes. The dynamic variability inherent in biological samples further complicates training and model interpretability remains a concern, as the “black box” nature of deep learning can obscure how the models arrive at their conclusions. Addressing these issues, including the demand for large annotated datasets and potential data biases, is crucial for the future advancement of DL in bioimaging.
Conclusion
Optical microscopy is fundamental in biomedical applications, providing high resolution and non-invasive images, but its utility is restricted by persistent drawbacks such as blurring, poor resolution, and low SNR. To meet the increasing demands of biomedical imaging, integrating deep learning is essential. DL models, inspired by human cognitive function, are highly effective because they automatically extract complex features through multiple hidden layers, successfully overcoming the barriers associated with traditional image analysis. DL models notably improve image quality, especially in classification, segmentation, and restoration tasks. For instance, CNNs excel at extracting spatial patterns, ResNet prevents performance degradation in deep networks, and U-Net is highly successful in segmentation tasks due to its ability to capture details across multiple scales. The variety of DL models discussed in this review, each leveraging different architectures to mitigate specific optical drawbacks, highlights the transformative role of computational intelligence in enhancing the efficiency and capabilities of optical microscopy.
Source:
Journal Reference
Lahari P. V., Dutta S., et al. (2026). Deep Learning Integration in Optical Microscopy: Advancements and Applications. Microscopy Research and Technique, 0(0), 1–24. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.70112, https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jemt.70112