Constraints on Anisotropic Cosmic Birefringence from CMB B-mode Polarization

By Ankit SinghReviewed by Louis CastelAug 22 2025

Understanding the subtle properties of the cosmos often relies on precise measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. One intriguing phenomenon in this area is anisotropic cosmic birefringence (ACB), a direction-dependent rotation of the polarization plane of photons as they travel through the universe. ACB is particularly compelling because it could signal new physics beyond the Standard Model, potentially linked to parity-violating effects such as axion-like particles or certain dark energy models.

In recent years, the topic has gained traction in cosmology, especially as instrumentation and analysis techniques have improved. Enhanced polarimetric sensitivity and better control of systematic errors in CMB B-mode polarization experiments have led to the tightest constraints on cosmic birefringence yet. These advances not only help rule out (or better define) the influence of new physics on cosmic polarization but also deepen our understanding of early-universe processes tied to pseudoscalar fields and symmetry-violating interactions.

Image Credit: Triff/Shutterstock.com

What is Cosmic Birefringence?

Cosmic birefringence refers to the rotation of the polarization plane of linearly polarized light as it travels through space. This subtle effect can arise from interactions between photons and various cosmic fields, some of which may be linked to dark energy or previously unknown fundamental forces. There are two main types: isotropic birefringence, where the rotation is the same in all directions, and anisotropic birefringence, where the rotation depends on the direction of travel. These directional differences imprint distinct polarization patterns on the sky, offering valuable insights into the structure and physics of the universe.^1,2

Studying CMB polarization plays a key role in cosmological surveys, offering insights into the structure, composition, and fundamental physics of the early universe. These polarization patterns are typically broken down into two components: E-modes, which have a gradient-like structure and even parity, and B-modes, which exhibit a distinctive curl-like pattern. While E-modes are primarily produced by scalar density fluctuations, B-modes can arise from gravitational lensing and from the conversion of E-modes into B-modes through effects like cosmic birefringence. Detecting B-modes is especially important because they can reveal subtle anisotropic birefringence signals, potentially caused by axion-photon mixing or other exotic parity-violating interactions.^1,2,3

Download the PDF of the article

Observational Techniques & Challenges

Detecting the minuscule signals of ACB in CMB B-modes is among the most technically demanding tasks in modern observational cosmology. Polarization-sensitive telescopes such as Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), South Pole Telescope polarimeter (SPTpol), POLARBEAR, and BICEP are built with state-of-the-art optical systems that include polarization modulators and cryogenic detector arrays, cryogenic detector arrays, and meticulously calibrated optics.^1,3

Important components of these instruments are superconducting bolometers and transition edge sensors (TES), which provide high sensitivity to faint polarization signals. In addition, polarization modulators detect true sky changes by rotating the polarization angle. Calibration systems use on-site polarized sources and celestial references to ensure precise measurements of both angle and amplitude.^1,2

However, extracting a cosmic birefringence signal, especially the anisotropic component, is a formidable challenge. Instrumental systematics, such as minute miscalibrations of detector polarization angles or optical imperfections, can mimic or obscure genuine cosmic signals. Careful instrument calibration, continuous monitoring, and rigorous cross-checks through multiple independent experiments are necessary.^1,3,4

Foreground emission from polarized dust and synchrotron radiation in the Milky Way galaxy constitutes another significant obstacle. Removing these foregrounds requires advanced component separation algorithms and multifrequency coverage. Cosmic variance, the statistical uncertainty inherent in measuring a finite number of sky patches, further limits the precision with which anisotropic effects can be tested.^1,3,4

Anisotropic signatures are harder to isolate than isotropic counterparts, both because the signal is generally weaker and because modeling spatially variable systematics requires more data and calibration. Advanced analysis techniques, including quadratic estimators and cross-correlation analyses between distinct data sets, are used to reconstruct the sky map of birefringence rotation and quantify its angular power spectrum.^1,3,4

Latest Research & Constraints

Recent studies have significantly improved the upper limits on ACB by combining data from multiple next-generation CMB experiments. Sophisticated analyses integrating polarization measurements from SPTpol, ACT, POLARBEAR, and BICEP have set the current leading constraint on the amplitude of anisotropic cosmic birefringence. According to a recent study published in Physical Review D, the best-fit amplitude was found to be A_CB=0.42^{(+0.40, −0.34)} ×10⁻⁴, with a 95% confidence upper bound at A_CB less than 1×10⁻⁴. This result is consistent with zero within the current uncertainties, indicating an absence of robust evidence for anisotropic cosmic birefringence in the present data.¹

Importantly, these findings aren't driven by any single experiment—they remain consistent across different combinations of datasets. Earlier analyses based solely on SPTpol data showed a slight, though not statistically significant, preference for nonzero anisotropic cosmic birefringence (ACB). However, this hint weakened with the addition of data from ACT, POLARBEAR, and BICEP. The stability of these constraints across multiple independent measurements strengthens confidence that systematic errors are well-managed and that the reported upper limits are reliable.¹

The power spectrum of ACB reflects its anisotropic nature while also confirming zero rotation within the current sensitivity levels. Contemporary results hold at modest statistical significance (typically less than 2σ), emphasizing the need for future observations with enhanced sensitivity and lower systematics to either unveil a real signal or further constrain the amplitude of possible anisotropies.¹

Theoretical Implications

These new ACB constraints carry considerable weight for both fundamental physics and cosmological model-building. Firstly, many parity-violating extensions to the Standard Model, such as those involving axion-like particles with a Chern-Simons coupling to electromagnetism, generically predict some level of cosmic birefringence. The stringent upper limits on ACB now place significant pressure on these models, restricting the parameter space for the allowed strength and spatial behavior of such fields.^1,3

Moreover, models linking dark energy or late universe scalar fields to cosmic birefringence are similarly constrained. If dark energy is dynamical and interacts with light, it could induce both isotropic and anisotropic birefringence signatures. Tightly bounding ACB implies such couplings must be far weaker than previously unconstrained models allowed.^1,3

Precision cosmological parameter estimation, particularly for parameters sensitive to polarization anisotropies such as the tensor-to-scalar ratio and relic gravitational wave background, benefits from the rigorous constraint of all possible contaminating effects, including ACB. Neglecting small but non-negligible rotation effects could otherwise bias future inferences about inflationary physics or the nature of dark energy.^1,4

Industry & Technological Relevance

The remarkable advances in measuring the CMB’s faint polarization signals have driven parallel progress in optical instrumentation. The development of large-scale, ultra-sensitive TES and kinetic inductance detector (KID) arrays, advanced polarization modulators, and cryogenic optics has not only aided cosmological observations but has also pushed innovations in quantum sensing and Earth remote sensing.^5,6

Leading the charge in this technology ecosystem are both academic consortia and industry partners. Companies specializing in superconducting detector fabrication and research groups within the Simons Observatory collaboration have developed scalable array manufacturing techniques and polarization-preserving optics.⁷ Calibration methods, vital for controlling systematic effects in polarization observations, are now seeing application in fields such as optical metrology and communications, demonstrating the cross-pollination between fundamental science and industry.^5-7

Future Directions

A host of ambitious experiments promises significant enhancements in sensitivity to cosmic birefringence. The Simons Observatory is set to deploy massive, multifrequency detector arrays aimed at improving both E- and B-mode polarization measurements across large sky patches. CMB-S4, a next-generation ground-based project, aims to expand sky coverage and reduce instrumental noise to unprecedented levels, enabling much tighter bounds or possible detection of both isotropic and anisotropic birefringence.^8,9

On the space-based front, the Japanese-led LiteBIRD mission will survey the sky with exquisite polarization calibration, focusing on the clean measurement of inflationary B-modes and serving as a robust platform for further tests of cosmic birefringence.¹⁰

Modern observational cosmology continues to advance through improved sky coverage and higher angular resolution. However, minimizing systematic errors remains a critical challenge. Addressing this requires a combination of strategies, including innovative modulation techniques, improved polarization calibration, and careful cross-comparisons between different surveys. The integration of machine learning methods and tomographic analysis tools is expected to further enhance our ability to detect and interpret cosmic birefringence signatures in CMB maps.^1,3,4

The lack of detectable anisotropic cosmic birefringence in current data imposes significant constraints on exotic fundamental physics and also sets clear targets for future experimental efforts. As sensitivity improves, the next decade will either reveal subtle fingerprints of new cosmic fields or reinforce the straightforward nature of the photon's journey through the universe, an important development for the understanding of the fundamental laws governing the cosmos.

Learn more about ultraviolet light here

References and Further Reading

• 1. Lonappan, A. I. et al. (2025). Constraints on anisotropic cosmic birefringence from CMB B-mode polarization. Phys. Rev. D, 112(2). DOI:10.1103/yxmh-rh9z. https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/yxmh-rh9z
  2. Namikawa, T. (2025). Exact CMB B-mode power spectrum from anisotropic cosmic birefringence. Phys. Rev. D, 109(12). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123521. https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123521
  3. Guzman, E. et al. (2022). Reconstructing Cosmic Polarization Rotation with ResUNet-CMB. Department of Physics, Southern Methodist University. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1903366
  4. Namikawa, T. (2025). Tomographic constraint on anisotropic cosmic birefringence. Physical Review D, 111(2). DOI:10.1103/physrevd.111.023501. https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023501
  5. Quantum sensing. (2024). Intermodulation Products. https://www.intermod.pro/applications/quantum-sensing
  6. Kinetic Inductance Detectors: a new imaging technology for observations in and from space. TU Delft. https://microelectronics.tudelft.nl/Research/project.php?id=18
  7. Duff, S.M. et al. (2024). The Simons Observatory: Production-Level Fabrication of the Mid- and Ultra-High-Frequency Wafers. J Low Temp Phys 216, 135–143. DOI:10.1007/s10909-024-03117-x. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10909-024-03117-x
  8. Mangu, A. et al. (2025). The Simons Observatory: Design, Optimization, and Performance of Low-Frequency Detectors. J Low Temp Phys 218, 21–28. DOI:10.1007/s10909-024-03234-7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10909-024-03234-7
  9. CMB S4. (2025). CMB-S4. https://cmb-s4.org/
  10. The Lite (Light) spacecraft for the study of B-mode polarization and Inflation from cosmic background Radiation Detection (LiteBIRD). ISAS. https://www.isas.jaxa.jp/en/missions/spacecraft/future/litebird.html

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.